Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
129
Highlights
52
Differences
4
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 737
vs
Anker Prime 27K:
129 Highlights & 52 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
See why Anker Prime's larger capacity and dual inputs might be a better fit, or why Anker 737's speed matters to some users.
We pitted Anker 737 and Anker Prime 27K head to head. Compare core features, input port type, maximum input power, input voltage range & charging efficiency, and tech perks in this deep-dive.
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 22 points higher
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 22 points higher
0.19 inch slimmer depth
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
1.96 inch
vs
2.15 inch
Travel-Friendly Size
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
with a difference of 1 points
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 41 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 32 points higher
Scratch Resistant
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
with a difference of 41 points
Uses Fire Retardant Material
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
with a difference of 1 points
Heat Resistant
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
with a difference of 1 points
Power Banks Face-Off: Anker 737 Versus Anker Prime
When searching for a reliable power bank for smartphones, tablets, laptops, or emergency travel backup, both the Anker 737 and Anker Prime stand out as premium choices. Sharing the core mission of delivering portable power on the go, they exhibit crucial commonalities such as USB-C and USB-A output ports, robust safety features, and smart app connectivity. However, these models diverge significantly in battery capacity, charging speed, build materials, and user interface. The Anker 737 features a 24,000 mAh Lithium-Polymer battery with around 300-500 cycle life, while the Anker Prime ups the ante with a 27,650 mAh Lithium-Ion battery rated for up to 800 cycles. Both pack a maximum output power of 140W per port but differ in total power delivery, input options, and design aesthetics, catering to different user styles and priorities.
Why the Anker 737 Might Be Your Precision Power Companion
The Anker 737 impresses with its highly precise LCD screen that offers an accurate 1% battery indicator and detailed remaining time display. If knowing exactly how much power you have left is crucial, this feature alone sets the 737 apart. Moreover, it boasts a relatively rapid 1.5-hour charging time powered by a single USB-C input port delivering 140W maximum input power, making it efficient for quick top-ups. The 737's slightly lighter weight of 1.39 lbs makes it easier to carry, though it has a larger footprint with a width of 6.13 inches. Constructed with a plastic and rubberized shell, it offers decent durability and heat resistance, functioning well within a temperature range of 32-95°F. Its user feedback is robust, with LED lights and app notifications enhancing daily usability.
How the Anker Prime Elevates Power and Durability to the Next Level
The Anker Prime is crafted for users who demand the ultimate in capacity and robust performance,e packaged in a compact, pocket-friendly design measuring just 2.24 inches wide and a height of 6.37 inches. This power bank wields a superior 27,650 mAh Lithium-Ion battery that supports 500-800 charge cycles, offering longevity beyond many competitors. Featuring two USB-C input ports, it supports fast charging, though it takes longer (~2.5 hours) to reach full capacity. Its defining strength lies in its astonishing 250W total output power, significantly surpassing the Anker 737's 140W, ideal for simultaneously powering multiple devices at high wattage.
The Prime's premium build incorporates an aluminum and plastic shell coupled with an internal metal frame, offering moderate impact and drop resistance up to 3 feet, alongside excellent scratch resistance and reinforced ports. When it comes to safety, it exceeds the 737 by providing foreign object detection and meeting UL certification standards. Advanced thermal management is another highlight, with four sensors and an automatic overheat recovery system that resumes operation immediately after cooling, an upgrade from the 737's mandatory cooldown approach.
The Anker Prime's minimalist LED indicator may not rival the 737's LCD detail, but it compensates with 100% battery level accuracy. Additionally, it shines in green technology aspects through a 95% energy conversion efficiency, eco mode, and environmental certifications like Energy Star. Including a powerful 250W wall adapter further enhances its convenience, a feature the 737 does not bundle.
The Quick Take
The Anker 737 triumphs in delivering a precise and highly informative display, quicker charging on a single USB-C port, and a lightweight design suitable for those who value clear battery insights and portability. On the other hand, the Anker Prime dominates in sheer capacity, durability, total output power, and advanced safety features, making it perfect for power users who need robust, long-lasting performance and premium build quality.
Bottom Line Recommendation
For users prioritizing maximum power output, prolonged battery lifespan, enhanced durability, and comprehensive safety, along with an included wall charger, the Anker Prime is the outstanding choice. Conversely, if you lean towards an accurate LCD readout, faster single-port charging efficiency, and a slightly lighter form factor, the Anker 737 suits your needs well. Overall, the Anker Prime justifies its price point by packing more into a compact design with versatile, forward-thinking features.
Verdict
Winner:Anker Prime - Greater capacity, higher total output, advanced safety, and durable premium construction make it the best all-around performer.
Runner-up:Anker 737 - Exceptional display accuracy and slightly faster input charging for users who prefer detailed feedback and portable convenience.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Trying to choose between Anker 737 and Anker Prime 27K? This comparison includes everything — specs, pros and cons, and what users noticed most.
General Information
12
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Textured
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Matte, Glossy
vs
Finish Type
Anker 737 features a Textured finish type, whereas Anker Prime offers both Matte and Glossy options. Those who appreciate aesthetic variety might lean towards the Anker Prime.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
95
°F
0Votes
104
°F
0Votes
vs
Operating Temperature Maximum
Anker Prime has a higher maximum operating temperature of 104°F (40°C), while Anker 737 is rated for up to 95°F (35°C). This makes Anker Prime more suitable for warmer environments.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Power Bank
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Power Bank
Anker 737
This product is categorized as a Power Bank, designed to provide portable power for various electronic devices.
Identifies the functional category of the portable charging device.
In the battle of Product Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, Laptop Charging, Travel Backup, Emergency Power
Anker Prime 27K
This versatile power bank is designed for a broad range of applications, including Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, Laptop Charging, Travel Backup, and Emergency Power solutions.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
60
Anker 737
0Votes
2022
72
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
2023
vs
Release Year
The release year for Anker Prime is 2023, making it a newer model compared to Anker 737 which was released in 2022. Users seeking the latest generation product might prefer the Anker Prime.
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
China
37
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
China
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What color options are available?
71
Anker 737
0Votes
Black
76
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Black
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Waterproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
32
°F
0Votes
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
32-113°F
37
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
32-113°F
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 has a self-discharge rate of 2%, which is slightly lower than Anker Prime's 3%. The Anker 737 may retain its charge for a marginally longer period when not in use.
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
In the battle of Self-Discharge Rate,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Discharge Rate on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
The energy rating of Anker Prime is 250 Watts, substantially higher than Anker 737's 86.4 Watts. Anker Prime can store and deliver significantly more energy.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
163.6 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime boasts a superior cycle life rating of 500–800 cycles, offering longer durability than Anker 737's 300–500 cycles. This means Anker Prime is expected to last longer in terms of battery lifespan.
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cycle Life Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Standby Power Loss,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cell Type
What type of battery cell does it use?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Cylindrical
77
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Cylindrical
Anker 737
The power bank uses Cylindrical battery cells, a common and robust cell type known for its reliability.
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank utilizes Cylindrical battery cells, known for their robustness and widespread use in high-capacity applications.
Indicates the physical form factor of the battery cells used.
In the battle of Battery Cell Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cell Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
24,000
mAh
0Votes
27,650
mAh
1Votes
vs
Battery Capacity
Anker Prime offers a significantly larger battery capacity of 27650 mAh, compared to Anker 737's 24000 mAh. Anker Prime is better suited for users needing more power on the go.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
3,650.0 mAh
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 27K ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Anker Prime clearly has more juice with its battery capacity. That extra 3650 mAh would be really helpful for longer trips.
See more
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
55
Anker 737
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Lithium-Ion
vs
Battery Chemistry
Anker 737 uses Lithium-Polymer battery chemistry, while Anker Prime utilizes Lithium-Ion. This difference in chemistry can influence energy density and overall performance characteristics.
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Configuration
What is the battery configuration?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Series Configuration
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Multi Cell
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank employs a Multi Cell battery configuration, which allows for higher capacity and more flexible power output.
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
24,000
mAh
0Votes
27,650
mAh
0Votes
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
3,650.0 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
41
Anker 737
0Votes
6
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
7
vs
Cell Count
Anker Prime is built with 7 battery cells, one more than the Anker 737 which has 6 cells. A higher cell count often correlates with increased capacity or power output capabilities.
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
3.6
Volt
0Votes
11.4
Volt
0Votes
vs
Battery Voltage
Anker Prime operates at a battery voltage of 11.4 Volts, a significant difference from Anker 737's 3.6 Volts. This higher voltage can impact the efficiency and power delivery of the Anker Prime.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
7.8 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Is overcharge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Prevents damage from charging beyond safe limits.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overdischarge Protection
Is overdischarge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overdischarge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 has a faster charging time of 1.5 hours, whereas Anker Prime takes 2.5 hours to fully charge. For quick recharges, the Anker 737 holds an advantage.
Estimates total time required to fully recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Charging Time,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 hour
measurement.
Based on community votes for Charging Time,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 27K ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Anker Prime boasts a charging efficiency of 90%, slightly higher than Anker 737's 87%. This means Anker Prime converts power more efficiently with less energy wasted as heat.
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
In the battle of Charging Efficiency,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Count
How many input ports does it have?
15
Anker 737
0Votes
1
37
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
2
vs
Input Port Count
Anker Prime provides two input ports, doubling the single input port available on Anker 737. This offers more flexibility for charging the Anker Prime itself.
Indicates how many input ports are available for charging.
In the battle of Input Port Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
5
Amp
0Votes
3
Amp
0Votes
vs
Input Current Rating
The Anker 737 has a higher input current rating of 5 Amps, compared to Anker Prime's 3 Amps. This suggests Anker 737 may be able to draw more current when recharging.
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
The power bank supports USB-C input, enabling faster and more versatile charging for the power bank itself.
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Input Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
140
Watt
0Votes
140
Watt
0Votes
Anker 737
The power bank delivers a maximum output power of 140 Watt, capable of fast-charging demanding devices like laptops.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
equal
140.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output Power on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current Rating
What is the output current rating?
5
Watt
0Votes
250
Watt
0Votes
vs
Output Current Rating
The Anker Prime has a much higher output current rating of 250 Watts, compared to Anker 737's 5 Watts. Anker Prime is designed for significantly more demanding power output needs.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
245.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
This power bank allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices, increasing convenience and efficiency.
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Total Output Power
What is the total output power?
140
Watt
0Votes
250
Watt
1Votes
vs
Total Output Power
Anker Prime delivers a significantly higher total output power of 250 Watts, exceeding Anker 737's 140 Watts. Anker Prime is better suited for charging multiple power-hungry devices simultaneously.
Measures the combined power available when using multiple ports.
In the battle of Total Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
110.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Total Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 27K ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Wow, the total output power on the Prime is significantly higher. 250W is a serious upgrade, letting me charge multiple devices faster.
See more
Output Port Type
What output port types are available?
65
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
Identifies the physical ports used to deliver power to devices.
In the battle of Output Port Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Count
How many output ports does it have?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
3
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
3
Indicates how many devices can be physically connected at once.
In the battle of Output Port Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage Range
What output voltage range is supported?
85
Anker 737
0Votes
5–28V
77
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
5–20V
vs
Output Voltage Range
Anker 737 features an output voltage range of 5–28V, which is broader than Anker Prime's 5–20V. This wider range may allow Anker 737 to support a greater variety of devices.
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Control
Does it manage power distribution automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Stability
How stable is the output power?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
Stable
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Very Stable
vs
Output Stability
Anker Prime offers
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Stability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
How accurate is the voltage regulation?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Good
77
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Excellent
vs
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
Anker Prime provides
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation Accuracy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Load Detection
Does it detect connected device load?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Power Supply
Does it support PPS charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
The power bank functions as a programmable power supply, allowing for dynamic voltage and current adjustments to optimize charging for different devices.
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
The power bank is compatible with Apple devices, ensuring efficient and safe charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple products.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
In the battle of Low-Current Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime is marginally heavier at 1.46 lbs (0.66 kg) compared to Anker 737's 1.39 lbs (0.63 kg). The Anker 737 is slightly lighter, which could be a factor for portability.
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
In the battle of Weight,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
6.13
inch
0Votes
2.24
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
Anker 737 measures 6.13 inches in width, while Anker Prime is more compact at 2.24 inches wide. Anker Prime is designed to be more easily portable and fit into narrower spaces.
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
3.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2.15
inch
0Votes
1.96
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
Anker Prime is slightly thinner with a depth of 1.96 inches (4.98 cm), compared to Anker 737's 2.15 inches (5.46 cm). This contributes to Anker Prime's more portable form factor.
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
1.95
inch
0Votes
6.37
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
Anker Prime is notably taller at 6.37 inches (16.18 cm), while Anker 737 has a height of 1.95 inches (4.95 cm). The Anker 737 offers a more compact, squarish design whereas the Anker Prime is taller and slimmer.
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
4.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Pocket-Friendly Design
Is it pocket-friendly?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
vs
Pocket-Friendly Design
Anker Prime is explicitly designed to be pocket-friendly, a feature not specified for Anker 737. This makes Anker Prime more convenient for on-the-go users.
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pocket-Friendly Design on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Travel-Friendly Size
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Size,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel-Friendly Size on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737's outer shell is made of Plastic and Rubberized materials, while Anker Prime uses Plastic and Aluminum. The aluminum component in Anker Prime may offer a more premium feel and improved heat dissipation.
Specifies the primary material used for the exterior housing.
In the battle of Outer Shell Material,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Outer Shell Material on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime benefits from structural reinforcement, a feature not available for Anker 737. This suggests the Anker Prime has a more robust internal construction.
Indicates added reinforcement for improved durability.
In the battle of Structural Reinforcement,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Structural Reinforcement on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Impact Resistance Rating
What is the impact resistance rating?
0
Anker 737
0Votes
Low Impact Resistance
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Moderate Impact Resistance
vs
Impact Resistance Rating
Anker Prime has a Moderate Impact Resistance rating, an upgrade from Anker 737's Low Impact Resistance. Anker Prime offers better protection against accidental drops.
Indicates the ability of the power bank to withstand shocks and physical impacts.
In the battle of Impact Resistance Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Impact Resistance Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Frame Material
What is the internal frame material?
30
Anker 737
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Metal
vs
Internal Frame Material
The internal frame of Anker Prime is made entirely of Metal, whereas Anker 737 uses a combination of Plastic and Metal. Anker Prime's full metal frame may provide greater structural rigidity.
Describes the internal structural material supporting the battery cells.
In the battle of Internal Frame Material,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Frame Material on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance Height
What drop height can it survive?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance Height
Anker Prime specifies a drop resistance height of 3 feet (0.91 meters), a detail not available for Anker 737. This provides a clearer expectation of durability for the Anker Prime.
Specifies the maximum drop height the device can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance
Is the power bank heat resistant?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
In the battle of Heat Resistance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Retardant Materials
Does it use fire-retardant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
In the battle of Fire Retardant Materials,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Retardant Materials on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
Is the surface scratch resistant?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
vs
Scratch Resistance
Anker Prime includes scratch resistance, a feature not specified for Anker 737. This means Anker Prime is better equipped to maintain its aesthetic appearance over time.
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Button Durability Rating
How durable are the buttons?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
Good
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Very Good
vs
Button Durability Rating
Anker Prime boasts a
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
In the battle of Button Durability Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Durability Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
vs
Port Reinforcement
Anker Prime includes port reinforcement, a feature not specified for Anker 737. This enhances the durability of the charging ports on the Anker Prime, protecting against wear and tear.
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
60
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
LED Light, App Notification
Anker 737
Users receive feedback through LED Light indicators on the device and App Notification alerts on their connected smartphones, providing real-time status updates.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Alerts on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Display Type
What type of display does it have?
45
Anker 737
1Votes
LCD Screen
17
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
LED Indicator
vs
Display Type
Anker 737 features an LCD screen for information display, while Anker Prime uses a simpler LED Indicator. Users who prefer detailed numeric information may favor Anker 737's LCD.
Specifies the type of display used to show power information.
In the battle of Display Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Display Type,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 27K ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I really like the LCD screen on the Anker 737. It provides much more detailed information than a simple LED indicator.
See more
Indicator Accuracy
How accurate is the battery indicator?
1
%
0Votes
100
%
0Votes
vs
Indicator Accuracy
Anker Prime provides an indicator accuracy of 100%, significantly higher than Anker 737's 1%. This means Anker Prime offers much more precise battery level indications.
Measures how accurately the indicator reflects actual remaining power.
In the battle of Indicator Accuracy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
99.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Accuracy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Remaining Time Display
Does it display remaining time?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Shows estimated remaining usage or charging time.
In the battle of Remaining Time Display,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remaining Time Display on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Button Count
How many buttons are there?
20
Anker 737
0Votes
1
22
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
1
Indicates the number of physical control buttons.
In the battle of Button Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Wake Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Sleep Feature
Does it auto sleep when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Sleep Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Safety & Protection Features
14
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
This power bank is equipped with overcurrent protection, which prevents damage to connected devices by limiting the current flow.
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification
What safety certifications does it have?
63
Anker 737
0Votes
CE, FCC, RoHS
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
vs
Safety Certification
Anker Prime has a broader range of safety certifications, including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS, while Anker 737 lists CE, FCC, and RoHS. Anker Prime offers additional safety assurance with its UL certification.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Prevents damage when a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it include overvoltage protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Prevents voltage levels from exceeding safe limits.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Protection
Does it have thermal protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Shuts down or limits power when overheating is detected.
In the battle of Thermal Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature monitored internally?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
vs
Foreign Object Detection
Anker Prime includes Foreign Object Detection, a safety feature not specified for Anker 737. This adds an extra layer of protection against potential hazards when charging.
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foreign Object Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection
Is surge protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Protects against sudden power surges.
In the battle of Surge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Airline Safety Compliance
Is it airline-safe?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection Circuit
Does it include fire protection circuitry?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection Circuit on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fail-Safe Shutdown
Does it have fail-safe shutdown?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Firmware
Is safety firmware implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Firmware on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime has a higher thermal cutoff threshold of 158°F (70°C) compared to Anker 737's 149°F (65°C). This allows Anker Prime to operate safely at slightly higher internal temperatures.
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Cutoff Threshold on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Passive Cooling, Metal Chassis
37
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Passive Cooling, Heat Spreader
Anker Prime 27K
Heat dissipation is managed through Passive Cooling and a Heat Spreader, effectively drawing heat away from internal components to maintain optimal performance.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Dissipation Method on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Design Type
What cooling design type is used?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Enhanced Passive Cooling
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Passive Cooling
Anker 737
The device utilizes Enhanced Passive Cooling to dissipate heat, improving thermal performance without needing active cooling components.
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
A heat spread layer is incorporated into the design to efficiently distribute thermal energy, preventing hot spots and enhancing device longevity.
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Spread Layer on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
Charging temperature regulation is in place to prevent overheating during the charging cycle, protecting both the device and its battery.
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management System
Does it have a thermal management system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Management System on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Heat Sink on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Sensor Count
How many thermal sensors are used?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
3
87
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
4
vs
Thermal Sensor Count
Anker Prime incorporates 4 thermal sensors, one more than Anker 737's 3 sensors. This allows Anker Prime to have more comprehensive temperature monitoring for enhanced safety.
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
In the battle of Thermal Sensor Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Sensor Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Temperature Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime boasts a significantly higher energy conversion efficiency of 95%, compared to Anker 737's 88%. This means Anker Prime wastes less energy and delivers more usable power from its battery.
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Energy Conversion Efficiency,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
7.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Conversion Efficiency on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 has a lower idle power consumption of 0.1 Watt, whereas Anker Prime consumes 0.5 Watt when idle. Anker 737 is more power-efficient when not actively charging devices.
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
In the battle of Idle Power Consumption,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
0.4 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Power Consumption on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime includes an Eco Mode, a feature not specified for Anker 737. Users focused on energy saving and environmental impact may appreciate this addition in Anker Prime.
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Power Optimization
Does it optimize power automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Power Optimization on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Sustainable Materials
Does it use sustainable materials?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
vs
Sustainable Materials
Anker Prime is noted for using sustainable materials, a detail not available for Anker 737. This feature benefits environmentally conscious consumers.
Indicates use of environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Sustainable Materials,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainable Materials on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Recycling Program
Is a recycling program supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates manufacturer support for recycling or take-back programs.
In the battle of Recycling Program,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recycling Program on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Certification
What environmental certifications does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Energy Star, EPEAT
vs
Environmental Certification
Anker Prime holds
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime includes a wall adapter in its packaging, a component not provided with Anker 737. This means Anker Prime is ready to charge out of the box without additional purchases.
Indicates whether a wall charging adapter is provided.
In the battle of Wall Adapter,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Adapter on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Cable
Is a charging cable included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
A charging cable is included in the package, providing immediate connectivity for recharging devices or the power bank itself.
Indicates whether a charging cable is included in the box.
In the battle of Charging Cable,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Cable on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
2
ft
0Votes
1.97
ft
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
The included charging cable has a length of 1.97 ft (0.60 m), offering flexibility for connecting devices.
Specifies the length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
equal
2.00 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter Power Rating
What is the adapter power rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
250
Watt
0Votes
vs
Adapter Power Rating
Anker Prime comes with an adapter rated at 250 Watts, while the adapter power rating for Anker 737 is not available as it does not include one. Anker Prime's included adapter is very powerful.
Specifies the power output of the included wall adapter.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter Power Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is a carrying case included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether a protective carrying case is included.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Is a user manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether a user manual or guide is provided.
In the battle of User Manual,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
4.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the width of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
2.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the depth of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
7.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the height of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker Prime explicitly states that repair service is available, a service not specified for Anker 737. This provides added peace of mind for Anker Prime owners regarding potential repairs.
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Technical Support Availability
Is technical support available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Anker 737
Technical support is available to assist users with any product-related queries or issues.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
53
Anker 737
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat, App Support
47
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat
vs
Support Channels
Anker 737 offers support through Email, Phone, Live Chat, and App Support, while Anker Prime lists Email, Phone, and Live Chat. Anker 737 provides an additional app-based support channel.
Lists available customer support contact methods.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
65
Anker 737
0Votes
24 Months
67
Anker Prime 27K
0Votes
24 Months
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
3
years
0Votes
5
years
0Votes
vs
Firmware Support Duration
Anker Prime offers a longer firmware support duration of 5 years, compared to Anker 737's 3 years. This means Anker Prime will receive updates and bug fixes for a more extended period.
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
In the battle of Firmware Support Duration,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 27K ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
