Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
118
Highlights
55
Differences
7
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 737
vs
Ugreen 100W :
118 Highlights & 55 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Deciding between Anker 737 and Ugreen 100W? Here's a casual breakdown of their best benefits and use cases.
We pitted Anker 737 and Ugreen 100W head to head. Compare core features, output port count, output voltage range, output current rating & low-power device mode, and tech perks in this deep-dive.
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 30 points higher
Backward Compatible
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
with a difference of 5 points
Physical Dimensions & Weight
2.9 inch narrower width
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
3.23 inch
vs
6.13 inch
0.93 inch shorter height
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
1.02 inch
vs
1.95 inch
0.47 lbs lighter weight
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
0.925 lbs
vs
1.39 lbs
Travel-Friendly Size
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
with a difference of 5 points
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 45 points
Button Durability Rated Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 20 points higher
Scratch Resistant
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
with a difference of 39 points
Uses Fire Retardant Material
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
with a difference of 5 points
Heat Resistant
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
with a difference of 5 points
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 30 points higher
Backward Compatible
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
with a difference of 5 points
Physical Dimensions & Weight
2.9 inch narrower width
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
3.23 inch
vs
6.13 inch
0.93 inch shorter height
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
1.02 inch
vs
1.95 inch
0.47 lbs lighter weight
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
0.925 lbs
vs
1.39 lbs
Travel-Friendly Size
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
with a difference of 5 points
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 45 points
Button Durability Rated Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 20 points higher
Scratch Resistant
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
with a difference of 39 points
Uses Fire Retardant Material
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
with a difference of 5 points
Heat Resistant
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
with a difference of 5 points
Anker 737 Vs Ugreen 100W Power Banks: Power Meets Portability
Both the Anker 737 and Ugreen 100W power banks cater to users looking for versatile charging options across smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Each features USB Power Delivery support, fast charging technologies including PPS, and multiple USB ports for simultaneous device charging. Both models ensure comprehensive safety protections, such as overcharge and thermal protection, designed to keep your gear safe on the go.
Despite these similarities, they diverge considerably in key functional arenas. The Anker 737 boasts a heftier 24,000mAh battery capacity and unleashes up to 140W output power, making it ideal for demanding setups requiring rapid, high-powered charging. Meanwhile, the Ugreen 100W offers a lighter, more compact form factor with a slightly smaller 20,000mAh battery and caps out at 100W output; still impressive but geared more toward portability and moderate power needs. These differences extend into charging input speeds, with Anker's remarkably faster 140W max input versus Ugreen's 65W, and enhanced user feedback mechanisms like Anker's LCD screen compared to Ugreen's simpler LED indicators.
The Powerhouse: Anker 737's High-Performance Edge
What truly sets the Anker 737 apart is its exceptional charging muscle and intelligent features. Its 140W maximum output instantly elevates it above typical power banks, comfortably running power-intensive laptops alongside multiple devices without slowing down. Backed by a 24,000mAh energy reserve and robust 140W fast recharging capability, it minimizes downtime drastically, fully recharging in about 1.5 hours.
The user experience is enhanced by a full LCD screen that provides precise battery level readings and remaining charging time, making power management intuitive. It also features advanced thermal management with three sensors and a high cutoff threshold to better prevent overheating. Users benefit from smart connectivity, including Bluetooth integration, firmware upgrades, and app support, ensuring the device remains up to date and responsive to user needs.
Durability is bolstered by a plastic and rubberized shell designed for low impact resistance, and environmental responsibility is also notable with an included recycling program. The package sweetens the deal with a 2-meter charging cable and carrying case, adding convenience for travel.
Ugreen 100W: Portability Without Compromising Essentials
The Ugreen 100W excels as a nimble, budget-friendly contender. Its lean 0.925 lbs weight and compact size make it easy to sling into a bag or pocket, perfect for those valuing portability over raw output. Despite its smaller 20,000mAh battery, it still supports essential charging protocols such as Quick Charge, Power Delivery, and PPS, delivering a respectable 100W max output that suits most everyday laptops and mobile devices.
Built with a focus on durability, this model features moderate impact resistance, a scratch-resistant matte finish, and enhanced internal structural reinforcements, which protect it well from common travel mishaps. Its thermal system uses two sensors with a 140°C cutoff, working with passive cooling to maintain safe operating temperatures effectively, even if slightly less advanced than Anker's.
While it lacks smart features such as an app or Bluetooth and has a basic LED indicator instead of a detailed LCD, it still provides accurate battery level indication and automatic power optimization for energy efficiency. Charging input maxes out at 65W, requiring about 2 hours for a full recharge, which remains efficient for its class. The inclusion of a carrying case and a reasonably long 1-meter cable rounds out the package.
Quick Take
The Anker 737 wins major points for power, capacity, and smart functionalities, perfect for anyone needing fast, reliable charging for multiple devices, including high-drain laptops. Conversely, the Ugreen 100W shines for users who want a lightweight, compact power bank with solid performance and durability at an attractive price point.
Bottom Line
If top-tier power output, larger battery capacity, and intelligent features like anLCDy and app connectivity are non-negotiable, the Anker 737 stands as the clear leader. However, for those seeking a portable, rugged, and affordable option that still packs a reliable 100W punch, the Ugreen 100W is a practical and budget-friendly choice.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 737 - Offers superior power output, advanced thermal management, and comprehensive smart features for demanding users.
Runner-up: Ugreen 100W - Provides portable design, good durability, and essential fast charging at a lower price, ideal for moderate power needs.
This power bank is intended for use cases such as Laptop Charging, Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, and as a Travel Backup, highlighting its versatility.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Textured
75
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Matte
Anker 737
The power bank features a Textured finish, which enhances grip and provides a premium feel.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
95
°F
0Votes
104
°F
0Votes
vs
Operating Temperature Maximum
The Ugreen 100W can operate in slightly warmer conditions with a maximum operating temperature of 104°F (40°C), whereas the Anker 737 is rated for a maximum of 95°F (35°C).
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
60
Anker 737
0Votes
2022
65
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
2022
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
China
55
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
China
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What color options are available?
71
Anker 737
0Votes
Black
65
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Grey, Black
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Waterproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
32
°F
0Votes
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
32-113°F
57
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
-4-113°F
vs
Storage Temperature Range
The Ugreen 100W has a wider storage temperature range, supporting temperatures from -4°F to 113°F (-20°C to 45°C), significantly lower than the Anker 737's 32-113°F (0-45°C) range.
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Ugreen 100W has a superior cycle life rating of 500–800 cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for its battery compared to the Anker 737's 300–500 cycles.
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cycle Life Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Ugreen 100W has a slightly lower standby power loss of 0.3 Watts, making it marginally more power-efficient when not actively in use than the Anker 737, which has a standby loss of 0.36 Watts.
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
In the battle of Standby Power Loss,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
24,000
mAh
1Votes
20,000
mAh
0Votes
vs
Battery Capacity
The Anker 737 has a larger battery capacity of 24000 mAh, providing more power than the Ugreen 100W's 20000 mAh, which means longer usage or more charges.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
4,000.0 mAh
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 100W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The battery uses a Series-Parallel Configuration, balancing voltage and capacity to deliver stable power output.
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
55
Anker 737
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
55
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
24,000
mAh
0Votes
11,300
mAh
0Votes
vs
Rated Capacity
The Anker 737 boasts a significantly higher rated capacity of 24000 mAh, almost double the Ugreen 100W's 11300 mAh, indicating a greater usable energy reserve for the Anker.
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
12,700.0 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
86.4
Watt
0Votes
72
Watt
0Votes
vs
Energy Rating
The Anker 737 offers a higher energy rating of 86.4 Watt-hours, compared to the Ugreen 100W's 72 Watt-hours, meaning it stores more total energy for powering devices.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
14.4 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
41
Anker 737
0Votes
6
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
3.6
Volt
0Votes
3.6
Volt
0Votes
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
3.60 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Input Performance
10
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
85
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C
85
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
USB-C
Anker 737
The power bank features a USB-C input port, allowing for fast and reversible charging of the unit itself.
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Ugreen 100W
Fast input charging capabilities allow for quick recharging of the power bank itself, minimizing downtime.
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Input Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
The power bank supports USB-C input, enabling faster and more versatile charging for the power bank itself.
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Efficiency
What is the charging efficiency?
87
%
0Votes
85
%
0Votes
vs
Charging Efficiency
The Anker 737 demonstrates a slightly higher charging efficiency of 87% compared to the Ugreen 100W's 85%, meaning more energy is converted to usable power during charging.
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
In the battle of Charging Efficiency,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Input Power
What is the maximum input power?
140
Watt
1Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Input Power
The Anker 737 supports a much higher maximum input power of 140 Watts, enabling significantly faster recharging than the Ugreen 100W's 65 Watts.
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
75.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Input Power,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 100W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Anker's 140W maximum input power is insane. It means I can recharge it super fast compared to the Ugreen and get back to full power quickly.
See more
Input Port Count
How many input ports does it have?
15
Anker 737
0Votes
1
15
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
1
Indicates how many input ports are available for charging.
In the battle of Input Port Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage Range
What input voltage range is supported?
85
Anker 737
0Votes
5–28V
85
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
5–20V
vs
Input Voltage Range
The Anker 737 features a wider input voltage range of 5–28V, offering greater flexibility when connecting to various charging sources compared to the Ugreen 100W's 5–20V.
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
In the battle of Input Voltage Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
5
Amp
0Votes
5
Amp
0Votes
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Time
How long does it take to fully recharge?
1.5
hour
0Votes
2
hour
0Votes
vs
Charging Time
The Anker 737 recharges faster in 1.5 hours, providing a quicker turnaround than the Ugreen 100W, which takes 2 hours to fully charge.
Estimates total time required to fully recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Charging Time,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 hour
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Time on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 specifies an output current rating of 5 Watts, while the Ugreen 100W lists it as 100 Watts, indicating a substantially higher current delivery capability for the Ugreen.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
95.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 has a broader output voltage range of 5–28V, which allows it to adapt to and power a wider variety of devices than the Ugreen 100W's 5–20V range.
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
In the battle of Low-Power Device Mode,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Power Device Mode on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
140
Watt
1Votes
100
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
The Anker 737 delivers a higher maximum output power of 140 Watts, allowing it to charge more power-hungry devices faster than the Ugreen 100W's 100 Watts.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
40.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 100W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
The power bank is compatible with Apple devices, ensuring efficient and safe charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple products.
Ugreen 100W
This power bank is compatible with Apple devices, ensuring efficient charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple products.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Power Supply
Does it support PPS charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
The power bank functions as a programmable power supply, allowing for dynamic voltage and current adjustments to optimize charging for different devices.
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
vs
Wearable Device
The Anker 737 explicitly supports charging wearable devices, whereas this compatibility is not specified for the Ugreen 100W.
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
In the battle of Low-Current Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 provides highly accurate battery level indication with 1% accuracy, significantly more precise than the Ugreen 100W's 90% accuracy, giving a clearer picture of remaining power.
Measures how accurately the indicator reflects actual remaining power.
In the battle of Indicator Accuracy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
89.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Accuracy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
I really prefer the LCD screen on the Anker. It's so much better to see exact percentages and remaining time.
See more
Auto Sleep Feature
Does it auto sleep when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Ugreen 100W
The auto sleep feature conserves battery power by automatically shutting down the power bank when no device is connected or charging is complete.
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Sleep Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Alerts
What user alerts are available?
58
Anker 737
0Votes
LED Light, App Notification
25
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
LED Light
Anker 737
Users receive feedback through LED Light indicators on the device and App Notification alerts on their connected smartphones, providing real-time status updates.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Alerts on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Button Count
How many buttons are there?
20
Anker 737
0Votes
1
95
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
1
Indicates the number of physical control buttons.
In the battle of Button Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
75 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Touch Control
Does it support touch controls?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Wake Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The product holds multiple safety certifications including CE, FCC, and RoHS, ensuring compliance with international safety and environmental standards.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Ugreen 100W
Smart power management optimizes charging performance and device compatibility by intelligently adjusting power delivery.
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Firmware
Is safety firmware implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Ugreen 100W
The device features safety firmware, which includes algorithms and protocols designed to ensure safe and reliable operation.
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Firmware on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Protection
Does it have thermal protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Shuts down or limits power when overheating is detected.
In the battle of Thermal Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature monitored internally?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foreign Object Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Airline Safety Compliance
Is it airline-safe?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
A heat spread layer is incorporated into the design to efficiently distribute thermal energy, preventing hot spots and enhancing device longevity.
Ugreen 100W
A heat spread layer is incorporated into the design to efficiently distribute and dissipate heat, preventing hot spots.
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Spread Layer on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Design Type
What cooling design type is used?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Enhanced Passive Cooling
85
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Enhanced Passive Cooling
Anker 737
The device utilizes Enhanced Passive Cooling to dissipate heat, improving thermal performance without needing active cooling components.
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
Charging temperature regulation is in place to prevent overheating during the charging cycle, protecting both the device and its battery.
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Cooldown Required
95
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Automatic Resume
Anker 737
If an overheat event occurs, the power bank's recovery behavior dictates a Cooldown Required period before resuming normal operation, ensuring safety.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Passive Cooling, Metal Chassis
Having app support with the Anker is a huge convenience. It allows for better monitoring and controlling the power bank's functions.
See more
Bluetooth Connectivity
Does it support Bluetooth connectivity?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
vs
Bluetooth Connectivity
The Anker 737 includes Bluetooth Connectivity, a smart feature that is not available on the Ugreen 100W.
Indicates whether the power bank can connect wirelessly to other devices.
In the battle of Bluetooth Connectivity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Connectivity on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
vs
Firmware Upgradable
The Anker 737 features upgradable firmware, allowing for future improvements and bug fixes, which is not mentioned for the Ugreen 100W.
Indicates whether firmware can be updated to improve functionality.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Monitoring
Does it offer smart power monitoring?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
vs
Smart Power Monitoring
The Anker 737 includes smart power monitoring capabilities, providing users with detailed insights into power usage, a feature not specified for the Ugreen 100W.
Provides real-time monitoring of power flow and usage.
In the battle of Smart Power Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Usage Analytics
Does it provide usage analytics?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
vs
Device Usage Analytics
The Anker 737 offers device usage analytics, allowing users to track their charging patterns, which is not available for the Ugreen 100W.
Tracks connected device charging behavior and patterns.
In the battle of Device Usage Analytics,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Usage Analytics on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Status Monitoring
Can status be monitored remotely?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Allows users to check power bank status remotely.
In the battle of Remote Status Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Status Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Alerts
Are smart alerts available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Sends alerts for battery status, faults, or charging completion.
In the battle of Smart Alerts,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Alerts on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
A charging cable is included in the package, providing immediate connectivity for recharging devices or the power bank itself.
Indicates whether a charging cable is included in the box.
In the battle of Charging Cable,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Cable on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
2
ft
0Votes
1
ft
0Votes
Specifies the length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is a carrying case included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates whether a protective carrying case is included.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Wall Adapter
Is a wall adapter included?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates whether a wall charging adapter is provided.
In the battle of Wall Adapter,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Adapter on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter Power Rating
What is the adapter power rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the power output of the included wall adapter.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter Power Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Is a user manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates whether a user manual or guide is provided.
In the battle of User Manual,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
4.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the width of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
2.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the depth of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
7.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the height of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty & Support
7
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Ugreen 100W
Battery warranty coverage is included, protecting against defects or premature failure of the internal battery.
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Technical Support Availability
Is technical support available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Anker 737
Technical support is available to assist users with any product-related queries or issues.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
53
Anker 737
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat, App Support
65
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
Email, Live Chat
Anker 737
Multiple support channels are available, including Email, Phone, Live Chat, and App Support, to provide comprehensive customer assistance.
Lists available customer support contact methods.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
65
Anker 737
0Votes
24 Months
45
Ugreen 100W
0Votes
24 Months
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
3
years
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
