Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
Anker 737
vs
Ugreen 145W:
108 Highlights & 54 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Find out which power bank offers the best balance of price, longevity, and advanced features.
We pitted Anker 737 and Ugreen 145W head to head. Compare core features, input voltage range, fast input charging, charging efficiency & charging time, and tech perks in this deep-dive.
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 20 points higher
Backward Compatible
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
with a difference of 1 points
Physical Dimensions & Weight
0.9 inch shorter height
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
1.05 inch
vs
1.95 inch
0.28 lbs lighter weight
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
1.11 lbs
vs
1.39 lbs
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 39 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 30 points higher
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
with 20 points higher
0.9 inch shorter height
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
1.05 inch
vs
1.95 inch
0.28 lbs lighter weight
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
1.11 lbs
vs
1.39 lbs
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 39 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 30 points higher
When it comes to high-capacity portable chargers designed for smartphones, tablets, and laptops, both the Anker 737 (PowerCore 24K) and the Ugreen 145W Power Bank stand out as excellent contenders. They share key features such as multi-port charging, USB-C and USB-A connectivity, and robust safety protections including short circuit protection, thermal protection, and compliance with airline safety standards. These power banks both support devices that demand fast, reliable power delivery on the go.
Despite their many similarities, some fundamental distinctions set them apart. The Anker 737 boasts a slightly smaller battery capacity of 24,000mAh versus Ugreen's 25,000mAh, but compensates with a notably higher input power of 140W for quicker recharge times. Meanwhile, Ugreen's power bank offers marginally higher total output power (145W) and a longer cycle life, ideal for sustained heavy use and durability.
Why the Anker 737 May Capture Your Attention
The Anker 737 distinguishes itself primarily through its impressively fast charging time of approximately 1.5 hours, thanks to its high-power single USB-C input rated for 140W. This is a boon for users who demand rapid turnaround when recharging their power bank between uses.
Another highlight is its detailed LCD screen, which provides precise battery level indicators and remaining time estimates. Coupled with Bluetooth connectivity and app support, it offers real-time monitoring, remote status updates, and firmware upgrades; features that set it apart for those seeking a smart charging experience.
The Anker 737 is also engineered with a metal chassis and an enhanced thermal management system that includes three thermal sensors, ensuring consistent performance and safety under continuous high-load conditions. Its durable rubberized outer shell and responsive button design add to user comfort and reliability. Included accessories, such as a handy carrying case and a 2-foot charging cable, round out a premium package worthy of tech enthusiasts.
Where Ugreen 145W Shines Bright
The Ugreen 145W power bank brings its own set of strengths, particularly appealing to those valuing capacity, ruggedness, and versatile input options. It houses a slightly larger 25,000mAh battery configured with a pouch cell chemistry and rated cycle life of 500-800 cycles, offering greater longevity compared to Anker's 300-500 cycles. This extended lifespan makes it a smart investment for heavy users.
Its output capability peaks at a combined 145W total output and supports a notably higher rated output current (145A), which, if accurately interpreted, suggests robust performance for power-hungry laptops and multiple-device charging.
Durability is another area where Ugreen excels, featuring moderate impact resistance, drop resistance up to 3 meters, scratch resistance, and reinforced ports that stand up better to rugged environments. Its slimmer profile and lighter weight at 1.11 lbs enhance portability without sacrificing robustness.
Ugreen also supports fast input charging through multiple ports (three inputs, including USB-C and USB-A), a contrast to Anker's single-port input design. This flexibility can be advantageous for charging convenience.
Included is a longer 5-foot charging cable, though unlike Anker, it does not include a carrying case. Nevertheless, it offers tremendous value for price-conscious users, costing around $79.99 at Ugreen.com.
Quick Take
The Anker 737 impresses with its rapid recharge time, intelligentLCDy, and smart app integration, making it perfect for tech-savvy users who appreciate detailed power management. On the other hand, the Ugreen 145W power bank wins points for its larger battery capacity, tougher build, and greater value, appealing to those who prioritize durability and budget.
Bottom Line
For anyone who needs a powerful, fast-recharging, and smart portable charger with detailed battery insights and a premium feel, the Anker 737 is the top pick. Conversely, if longer battery life, ruggedness for outdoor use, and cost efficiency dominate your priorities, the Ugreen 145W is an outstanding choice that won't disappoint over the years of usage.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 737 - Exceptional fast charging, smart LCD, and app connectivity make it the superior choice for users who want technology and speed combined.
Runner-up: Ugreen 145W Power Bank - Larger battery capacity, rugged design, and more wallet-friendly price appeal to durability-focused and budget-conscious users.
The power bank is primarily intended for Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, Laptop Charging, Travel Backup, Emergency Power. Its versatile design caters to various power needs on the go.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
China
35
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
China
Ugreen 145W
The country of origin for this product is China. This indicates where the device is manufactured.
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Textured
35
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Matte
Anker 737
The power bank features a Textured finish, which enhances grip and provides a premium feel.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
95
°F
0Votes
104
°F
0Votes
vs
Operating Temperature Maximum
The Anker 737 has an Operating Temperature Maximum of 95°F (35°C), while the Ugreen 145W can operate up to 104°F (40°C). The Ugreen 145W offers slightly better tolerance for warmer conditions.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
60
Anker 737
0Votes
2022
60
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
2022
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Waterproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
32
°F
0Votes
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
32-113°F
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
-4-140°F
vs
Storage Temperature Range
The Anker 737 has a Storage Temperature Range of 32-113°F (0-45°C), whereas the Ugreen 145W has a much broader range of -4-140°F (-20-60°C). The Ugreen 145W is more suitable for storage in extreme temperatures.
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 offers a Battery Capacity of 24000 mAh, which is slightly less than the Ugreen 145W's 25000 mAh capacity. The Ugreen 145W provides a marginal increase in theoretical charge storage.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
1,000.0 mAh
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Anker 737 has a Cycle Life Rating of 300–500 Cycles, which is lower than the Ugreen 145W's 500–800 Cycles. The Ugreen 145W offers a significantly longer expected lifespan in terms of charge and discharge cycles.
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
20 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cell Type
What type of battery cell does it use?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Cylindrical
80
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Pouch
vs
Battery Cell Type
The Anker 737 uses a Cylindrical Battery Cell Type, while the Ugreen 145W utilizes a Pouch type. These are different internal battery structures, impacting form factor and potentially energy density.
Indicates the physical form factor of the battery cells used.
In the battle of Battery Cell Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cell Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
86.4
Watt
0Votes
90
Watt
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
The power bank has an energy rating of 90 Watt. This indicates its capacity to deliver power to connected devices efficiently.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
3.6 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
3.6
Volt
0Votes
3.6
Volt
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
The internal battery voltage is 3.6 Volt. This is a fundamental electrical characteristic of the battery cells.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
equal
3.60 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Discharge Rate
What is the self-discharge rate?
2
%
0Votes
3
%
0Votes
Anker 737
The device has a low self-discharge rate of 2%, meaning it retains most of its charge even when stored for extended periods.
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
In the battle of Self-Discharge Rate,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Discharge Rate on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
55
Anker 737
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
55
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
24,000
mAh
0Votes
14,500
mAh
0Votes
vs
Rated Capacity
The Anker 737 has a Rated Capacity of 24000 mAh, significantly higher than the Ugreen 145W's 14500 mAh. The Anker 737 offers a substantially greater usable capacity for charging devices.
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
9,500.0 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
41
Anker 737
0Votes
6
41
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
6
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 uses a Series Configuration for its battery, whereas the Ugreen 145W employs a Series-Parallel Configuration. This difference affects power delivery and capacity distribution within the battery.
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Loss
How much power is lost in standby?
0.36
Watt
0Votes
0.3
Watt
0Votes
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
In the battle of Standby Power Loss,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Is overcharge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Prevents damage from charging beyond safe limits.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Overdischarge Protection
Is overdischarge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overdischarge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 has a Charging Efficiency of 87%, which is slightly lower than the Ugreen 145W's 90%. The Ugreen 145W converts power more efficiently, potentially leading to less wasted energy and faster charging.
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
In the battle of Charging Efficiency,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
In the battle of Input Voltage Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
85
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C
70
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
vs
Input Port Type
The Anker 737 exclusively uses a USB-C Input Port Type, whereas the Ugreen 145W offers both USB-C and USB-A input options. The Ugreen 145W provides greater flexibility for charging the power bank itself.
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
5
Amp
0Votes
5
Amp
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
The input current rating is 5 Amp. This indicates the maximum current the power bank can draw when being recharged, affecting its recharge speed.
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
The power bank supports USB-C input, enabling faster and more versatile charging for the power bank itself.
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Pass-Through Charging is yes. This feature enables you to charge the power bank itself while simultaneously charging connected devices.
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Input Power
What is the maximum input power?
140
Watt
1Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Input Power
The Anker 737 supports a Maximum Input Power of 140 Watts, significantly higher than the Ugreen 145W's 65 Watts. The Anker 737 can recharge itself much faster if paired with a compatible high-wattage charger.
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
75.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Input Power,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Anker's maximum input power is superior. This means it recharges way faster.
See more
Input Port Count
How many input ports does it have?
15
Anker 737
0Votes
1
55
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
3
vs
Input Port Count
The Anker 737 features a single Input Port, while the Ugreen 145W provides three Input Ports. The Ugreen 145W offers more options for charging the power bank.
Indicates how many input ports are available for charging.
In the battle of Input Port Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Technology
Which fast charging technologies are supported?
50
Anker 737
0Votes
Power Delivery, PPS
50
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Power Delivery, Quick Charge, PPS
vs
Fast Charging Technology
The Anker 737 supports Power Delivery and PPS fast charging technologies, whereas the Ugreen 145W adds Quick Charge to these, supporting Power Delivery, Quick Charge, and PPS. The Ugreen 145W offers broader compatibility with various fast-charging standards.
Lists supported fast-charging standards.
In the battle of Fast Charging Technology,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Technology on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
This power bank allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices, increasing convenience and efficiency.
Ugreen 145W
Simultaneous Device Charging is yes. This feature allows the power bank to charge multiple devices at the same time, increasing convenience and efficiency.
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current Rating
What is the output current rating?
5
Watt
0Votes
145
Watt
0Votes
vs
Output Current Rating
The Anker 737 has an Output Current Rating of 5 Watts, which appears to be a mislabeled unit and value, while the Ugreen 145W has a significantly higher 145 Watts. The Ugreen 145W can handle much higher current demands for devices.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
140.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Output Power
What is the total output power?
140
Watt
0Votes
145
Watt
1Votes
vs
Total Output Power
The Anker 737 has a Total Output Power of 140 Watts, while the Ugreen 145W offers a slightly higher 145 Watts. The Ugreen 145W can deliver a marginally greater combined power output across all its ports.
Measures the combined power available when using multiple ports.
In the battle of Total Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
5.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Total Output Power,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Ugreen has a slightly higher total output power. Every little bit helps for my devices.
See more
Output Port Type
What output port types are available?
65
Anker 737
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
Identifies the physical ports used to deliver power to devices.
In the battle of Output Port Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Control
Does it manage power distribution automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Stability
How stable is the output power?
35
Anker 737
0Votes
Stable
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Very Stable
vs
Output Stability
The Anker 737 provides Stable output, while the Ugreen 145W is rated as Very Stable. The Ugreen 145W offers a slightly more consistent power delivery.
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Stability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
How accurate is the voltage regulation?
45
Anker 737
0Votes
Good
75
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Excellent
vs
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
The Anker 737 offers Good Voltage Regulation Accuracy, whereas the Ugreen 145W is rated as Excellent. The Ugreen 145W provides more precise voltage delivery, which can be beneficial for sensitive electronics.
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation Accuracy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Detection
Does it detect connected device load?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Power Device Mode
Is there a low-power device mode?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
In the battle of Low-Power Device Mode,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Power Device Mode on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it auto shut off when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Protocols & Compatibility
12
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Quick Charge technology is yes. This enables significantly faster charging speeds for compatible devices, reducing the time needed to power up.
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Power Supply
Does it support PPS charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
The power bank functions as a programmable power supply, allowing for dynamic voltage and current adjustments to optimize charging for different devices.
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
The power bank is compatible with Apple devices, ensuring efficient and safe charging for iPhones, iPads, and other Apple products.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Laptop Charging capability is yes. The power bank can provide sufficient power output to charge laptops, making it a versatile travel companion.
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Protocol
Does it support multiple protocols?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Multi-Protocol support is yes. This ensures broad compatibility with various fast-charging standards across different brands and devices.
In the battle of Multi-Protocol,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Protocol on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
In the battle of Low-Current Device,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Protocol Auto-Detection
Does it auto-detect charging protocols?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically selects the best protocol for each device.
In the battle of Protocol Auto-Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protocol Auto-Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Size,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel-Friendly Size on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
How much does it weigh?
1.39
lbs
0Votes
1.11
lbs
1Votes
vs
Weight
The Anker 737 weighs 1.39 lbs (0.63 kg), making it heavier than the Ugreen 145W, which weighs 1.11 lbs (0.50 kg). The Ugreen 145W is lighter and potentially more portable.
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
In the battle of Weight,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.3 lbs
measurement.
Based on community votes for Weight,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Ugreen is noticeably lighter in weight. Easier to carry around when traveling.
See more
Height
What is the height?
1.95
inch
0Votes
1.05
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
The Anker 737 has a Height of 1.95 inches (4.95 cm), which is almost twice as tall as the Ugreen 145W's 1.05 inches (2.67 cm). The Ugreen 145W is significantly flatter.
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
6.13
inch
0Votes
6.3
inch
0Votes
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2.15
inch
0Votes
3.18
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
The Anker 737 has a Depth of 2.15 inches (5.46 cm), while the Ugreen 145W is deeper at 3.18 inches (8.08 cm). The Anker 737 has a slimmer profile.
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Pocket-Friendly Design
Is it pocket-friendly?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pocket-Friendly Design on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 has an Internal Frame Material of Plastic and Metal, whereas the Ugreen 145W uses only Metal. The Ugreen 145W may offer greater structural rigidity.
Describes the internal structural material supporting the battery cells.
In the battle of Internal Frame Material,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Frame Material on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 has a Good Button Durability Rating, whereas the Ugreen 145W boasts a Very Good rating. The Ugreen 145W's buttons are expected to last longer and withstand more use.
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
In the battle of Button Durability Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Durability Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
1Votes
vs
Drop Resistance Height
The Anker 737 does not have a specified Drop Resistance Height, but the Ugreen 145W can withstand drops from 3 feet (0.91 meters). The Ugreen 145W offers a specified level of drop protection.
Specifies the maximum drop height the device can withstand.
Based on community votes for Drop Resistance Height,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Anker 737 uses Plastic and Rubberized materials for its Outer Shell, while the Ugreen 145W uses Plastic and Polycarbonate. The Anker might offer a grippier feel due to rubberization.
Specifies the primary material used for the exterior housing.
In the battle of Outer Shell Material,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Outer Shell Material on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 does not specify Scratch Resistance, but the Ugreen 145W explicitly states it has Scratch Resistance. The Ugreen 145W's finish is designed to resist cosmetic damage better.
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 does not specify Structural Reinforcement, while the Ugreen 145W confirms it has this feature. The Ugreen 145W likely has a more robust internal structure.
Indicates added reinforcement for improved durability.
In the battle of Structural Reinforcement,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Structural Reinforcement on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Impact Resistance Rating
What is the impact resistance rating?
0
Anker 737
0Votes
Low Impact Resistance
45
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Moderate Impact Resistance
vs
Impact Resistance Rating
The Anker 737 has a Low Impact Resistance Rating, while the Ugreen 145W offers Moderate Impact Resistance. The Ugreen 145W is likely to withstand drops and bumps better.
Indicates the ability of the power bank to withstand shocks and physical impacts.
In the battle of Impact Resistance Rating,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Impact Resistance Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Retardant Materials
Does it use fire-retardant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
In the battle of Fire Retardant Materials,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Retardant Materials on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Port Reinforcement
The Anker 737 does not specify Port Reinforcement, while the Ugreen 145W explicitly states it has this feature. The Ugreen 145W's ports are designed to be more durable against wear and tear.
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 features an LCD Screen for its Display Type, offering detailed information, whereas the Ugreen 145W uses simpler LED Indicators. The Anker 737 provides more comprehensive visual feedback to the user.
Specifies the type of display used to show power information.
In the battle of Display Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
30 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Display Type,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
A Battery Level Indicator is yes. This feature provides a visual cue of the remaining battery charge, allowing users to know when to recharge the power bank.
Indicates whether the power bank shows remaining battery level.
In the battle of Battery Level Indicator,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Level Indicator on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Button Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Button Type
What type of button does it use?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Physical Button
25
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Physical Button
Anker 737
The power bank operates with a Physical Button, offering tactile feedback and reliable control.
Describes the type of button used for control.
In the battle of Button Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Alerts
What user alerts are available?
58
Anker 737
0Votes
LED Light, App Notification
20
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
LED Light
vs
User Feedback Alerts
The Anker 737 provides User Feedback Alerts via LED Light and App Notification, while the Ugreen 145W only offers LED Light alerts. The Anker 737 offers more versatile notification options, including app integration.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Alerts on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Accuracy
How accurate is the battery indicator?
1
%
0Votes
95
%
0Votes
vs
Indicator Accuracy
The Anker 737 boasts an Indicator Accuracy of 1%, providing very precise battery level information, while the Ugreen 145W has an accuracy of 95%. The Anker 737 offers a significantly more granular and accurate display of remaining power.
Measures how accurately the indicator reflects actual remaining power.
In the battle of Indicator Accuracy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
94.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Accuracy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Touch Control
Does it support touch controls?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Wake Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Sleep Feature
Does it auto sleep when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Sleep Feature on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
This power bank is equipped with overcurrent protection, which prevents damage to connected devices by limiting the current flow.
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification
What safety certifications does it have?
63
Anker 737
0Votes
CE, FCC, RoHS
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
vs
Safety Certification
The Anker 737 holds CE, FCC, and RoHS Safety Certifications, whereas the Ugreen 145W additionally includes UL certification. The Ugreen 145W has a broader range of recognized safety standards.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it include overvoltage protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Prevents voltage levels from exceeding safe limits.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature monitored internally?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foreign Object Detection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection
Is surge protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Protects against sudden power surges.
In the battle of Surge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection Circuit
Does it include fire protection circuitry?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection Circuit on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Fail-Safe Shutdown
Does it have fail-safe shutdown?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Firmware
Is safety firmware implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Firmware on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management & Cooling
12
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
Charging temperature regulation is in place to prevent overheating during the charging cycle, protecting both the device and its battery.
Ugreen 145W
Charging Temperature Regulation is yes. This mechanism ensures the battery charges within safe temperature limits, which is vital for battery health and safety.
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling
Does it support thermal throttling?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Thermal Throttling is yes. This protective measure automatically reduces power output if the device begins to overheat, preventing potential damage.
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
At what temperature does it shut down?
149
°F
0Votes
158
°F
0Votes
vs
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
The Anker 737 has a Thermal Cutoff Threshold of 149°F (65°C), while the Ugreen 145W's threshold is slightly higher at 158°F (70°C). The Ugreen 145W can tolerate a slightly warmer operating temperature before shutting down.
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Cutoff Threshold on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Design Type
What cooling design type is used?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
Enhanced Passive Cooling
75
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Enhanced Passive Cooling
Anker 737
The device utilizes Enhanced Passive Cooling to dissipate heat, improving thermal performance without needing active cooling components.
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
Surface Temperature Control is yes. This feature actively manages the external temperature of the power bank, ensuring it remains comfortable and safe to touch during operation.
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Temperature Control on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
A heat spread layer is incorporated into the design to efficiently distribute thermal energy, preventing hot spots and enhancing device longevity.
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Spread Layer on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Cooldown Required
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Automatic Resume
vs
Overheat Recovery Behavior
In case of overheating, the Anker 737 requires a Cooldown before resuming operation, whereas the Ugreen 145W offers Automatic Resume. The Ugreen 145W provides a more seamless recovery process.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management System
Does it have a thermal management system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Management System on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
25
Anker 737
0Votes
Passive Cooling, Metal Chassis
The Anker 737 uses Passive Cooling and a Metal Chassis for Heat Dissipation, while the Ugreen 145W employs a Heat Spreader and Graphite Sheet. Both have different approaches to managing heat, impacting efficiency and design.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Dissipation Method on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Heat Sink on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Sensor Count
How many thermal sensors are used?
75
Anker 737
0Votes
3
55
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
2
vs
Thermal Sensor Count
The Anker 737 has 3 Thermal Sensors, which is more than the Ugreen 145W's 2 Thermal Sensors. The Anker 737 offers more granular temperature monitoring throughout the device.
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
In the battle of Thermal Sensor Count,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Sensor Count on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Discharge Temperature Regulation
Is discharge temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 737 features App Support, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. Users of the Anker 737 can access additional controls and monitoring through a companion app.
Confirms whether a companion mobile app is available.
In the battle of App Support,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Support on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Provides real-time monitoring of power flow and usage.
In the battle of Smart Power Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Connectivity
Does it support Bluetooth connectivity?
Yes
1Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Bluetooth Connectivity
The Anker 737 includes Bluetooth Connectivity, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. The Anker 737 offers smart features and app control that the Ugreen 145W does not.
Indicates whether the power bank can connect wirelessly to other devices.
In the battle of Bluetooth Connectivity,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Bluetooth Connectivity,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Anker offers Bluetooth connectivity which is a neat smart feature. Ugreen lacks that.
See more
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Firmware Upgradable
The Anker 737 supports Firmware Upgradable, allowing for future improvements, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. The Anker 737 can receive software updates for enhanced performance or features.
Indicates whether firmware can be updated to improve functionality.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Usage Analytics
Does it provide usage analytics?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Device Usage Analytics
The Anker 737 provides Device Usage Analytics, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. Anker users can track their charging habits and statistics.
Tracks connected device charging behavior and patterns.
In the battle of Device Usage Analytics,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Usage Analytics on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging History Tracking
Is charging history tracked?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Charging History Tracking
The Anker 737 offers Charging History Tracking, a feature not available for the Ugreen 145W. This allows Anker users to review past charging sessions.
Records past charging sessions for review.
In the battle of Charging History Tracking,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging History Tracking on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Status Monitoring
Can status be monitored remotely?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Remote Status Monitoring
The Anker 737 supports Remote Status Monitoring, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. Anker users can check the power bank's status from a distance via an app.
Allows users to check power bank status remotely.
In the battle of Remote Status Monitoring,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Status Monitoring on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Alerts
Are smart alerts available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Smart Alerts
The Anker 737 provides Smart Alerts, a feature not available for the Ugreen 145W. Anker users can receive notifications about their power bank's status or issues.
Sends alerts for battery status, faults, or charging completion.
In the battle of Smart Alerts,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Alerts on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental & Efficiency
7
Energy Conversion Efficiency
What is the energy conversion efficiency?
88
%
0Votes
90
%
0Votes
vs
Energy Conversion Efficiency
The Anker 737 has an Energy Conversion Efficiency of 88%, which is slightly less than the Ugreen 145W's 90%. The Ugreen 145W is marginally more efficient at converting stored energy into usable power.
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Energy Conversion Efficiency,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Conversion Efficiency on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
How much power is used while idle?
0.1
Watt
0Votes
0.2
Watt
0Votes
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
In the battle of Idle Power Consumption,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Power Consumption on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Power Optimization
Does it optimize power automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Power Optimization on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Sustainable Materials
Does it use sustainable materials?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates use of environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Sustainable Materials,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainable Materials on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Recycling Program
Is a recycling program supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Recycling Program
The Anker 737 supports a Recycling Program, which is not specified for the Ugreen 145W. Anker demonstrates a commitment to end-of-life product responsibility.
Indicates manufacturer support for recycling or take-back programs.
In the battle of Recycling Program,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recycling Program on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Certification
What environmental certifications does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
A charging cable is included in the package, providing immediate connectivity for recharging devices or the power bank itself.
Indicates whether a charging cable is included in the box.
In the battle of Charging Cable,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Cable on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Is a user manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Ugreen 145W
A User Manual is yes. An included manual provides essential instructions on how to properly use and maintain the power bank, ensuring a smooth user experience.
Indicates whether a user manual or guide is provided.
In the battle of User Manual,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is a carrying case included?
Yes
1Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
vs
Carrying Case
The Anker 737 includes a Carrying Case, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. The Anker 737 offers added protection and portability convenience.
Indicates whether a protective carrying case is included.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Carrying Case,
Anker 737 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Ugreen 145W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Anker comes with a carrying case which is super convenient. Ugreen doesn't have one.
See more
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
2
ft
0Votes
5
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
The Anker 737 comes with a 2 ft (0.61 meter) Charging Cable, while the Ugreen 145W includes a longer 5 ft (1.52 meter) cable. The Ugreen 145W provides more flexibility for device placement during charging.
Specifies the length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
worse than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Wall Adapter
Is a wall adapter included?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether a wall charging adapter is provided.
In the battle of Wall Adapter,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wall Adapter on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter Power Rating
What is the adapter power rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the power output of the included wall adapter.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter Power Rating on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
4.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the width of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
2.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the depth of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
7.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures the height of the retail packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Firmware Support Duration
The Anker 737 specifies a Firmware Support Duration of 3 years, which is not available for the Ugreen 145W. Anker commits to providing software updates and support for a defined period.
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Technical Support Availability
Is technical support available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Anker 737
Technical support is available to assist users with any product-related queries or issues.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels
What support channels are available?
53
Anker 737
0Votes
Email, Phone, Live Chat, App Support
50
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
Email, Live Chat
vs
Support Channels
The Anker 737 offers more extensive Support Channels including Email, Phone, Live Chat, and App Support, compared to the Ugreen 145W which provides Email and Live Chat. Anker users have more ways to contact support.
Lists available customer support contact methods.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
65
Anker 737
0Votes
24 Months
65
Ugreen 145W
0Votes
24 Months
vs
Warranty Length
Both the Anker 737 and Ugreen 145W come with a Warranty Length of 24 Months (2 years). This provides a consistent period of coverage for both products.
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737
Yes
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 737 ◉ is
better than
Ugreen 145W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
No
0Votes
Anker 737
No
0Votes
Ugreen 145W
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
Anker 737 ◉ is
same as
Ugreen 145W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on Anker 737 ◉
vs Ugreen 145W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
